I-485 Employment-Based Inventory does it include Spouse applications also

[knsgsuresh]

I-485 Employment-Based Inventory does it include Spouse applications also

CAN Some Senior members clarify my doubts:
==================================
USCIS release I-485 Employment-Based Inventory countyr wise. Is this Numbers listed every year for the Employment based category include applications filled for Spouse also?

If it is not included then we need to take in to account that for every 485 application we will bare minimum have 1 spoude 485 application that requires VISA Number.

Link from USCIS:

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Str...%20Reports.pdf

[knsgsuresh]

Hi Senior members,

Request to look at the query and reply back to me if you have answers.

Thanks.

[simran]

Originally Posted by knsgsuresh

I-485 Employment-Based Inventory does it include Spouse applications also

CAN Some Senior members clarify my doubts:
==================================
USCIS release I-485 Employment-Based Inventory countyr wise. Is this Numbers listed every year for the Employment based category include applications filled for Spouse also?

If it is not included then we need to take in to account that for every 485 application we will bare minimum have 1 spoude 485 application that requires VISA Number.

Link from USCIS:

http://www.uscis.gov/USCIS/New%20Str...%20Reports.pdf

for spouse app to be approved, quota must be available.

[knsgsuresh]

Sorry if i have not framed my question right. My question is the PDF that USCIS released that Application count for EB category every month does the Application numbers listed in PDF include spouse applications also.

[ramsaiin]

Hello knsgsuresh,

I believe it includes all dependent applications: Spouse + Kids/Childs....as I-485 has to be filed separately for every applicant, so the count should be that of everyone!!

As it's already too complicated process for USCIS...having more than 1 database would be too much for them to handle!

But this is just my opinion...

Best Regards,
Ram

[knsgsuresh]

Thanks for your reply.